The following represent scribal corrections: For sigla of other manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials. The Codex Sinaticus, dating to around the early 4th century AD, is quite old and it's mostly, though not entirely, complete. B [4] Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. (and asked him and told him) Vaticanus, John 1:33 o nico manuscrito uncial com o texto completo do Novo Testamento e o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento . These two manuscripts were not written in the same scriptorium. [9] Milne-Skeat. [34]The same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435. [36] Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03,Wieland Willker. C N8699238348 6667. (till his), Matthew 2:12 Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. copbo, Matthew 13:57 b Codex Sinaiticus. [28] Frederic G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts (4th ed. It is in closer agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type. , Matthew 9:4b B, Matthew 9:10b N W, Matthew 13:28a 1 * f13892 C D 13-124-556 This article is from Wikipedia but has been updated and will be updated even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House. , Matthew 11:8 C E L W, Matthew 15:17 Legendary Leipzig scholar Constantine Tischendorf died surrounded by controversy at the relatively young age of 59. , Matthew 15:31 . majority of mss, Luke 8:3 aB C N 75235700 f1f1322 D W f13 (33) 1241 1424 it B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d A Modern analysis identifies at least three scribes: Scribe B was a poor speller, and scribe A was not very much better; the best scribe was D.[4]Metzger states: scribe A had made some unusually serious mistakes.[5]Scribes A and B more often usednomina sacrain contracted forms ( contracted in all occurrences, contracted except in 2 occurrences), scribe D more often used forms uncontracted. The 3000 textual variations do NOT include iotacism. Matthew 1:3 (begot) , Matthew 1:19 Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. syr, Matthew 6:25a There is at worst a 5% difference between the consensus text and the majority text. W, Matthew 13:35a a b h q U text were unified . Archived from the original on 2011-05-31. , Matthew 12:17 D L Z syrp, Matthew 10:12 (I) , Matthew 3:15 [34]The same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435. syrsin Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). Although Sinaiticus is usually considered to be a flagship manuscript of the Alexandrian Text, in John 1:1-8:38, its text is not Alexandrian; it is Western. B2, Matthew 13:33 [26]Accents and breathing marks, as well as punctuation, have been added by a later hand. Spelling differences (Zerah)B, supported byP1 and (Zerah). Misspelled word (by the sea) (by the sea) B. [6] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78. D , Matthew 14:29 71 D 157 Skeat, T.C., "The Codex Sinaiticus, The Codex Vaticanus and Constantine." Journal of Theological Studies 50 (1999): 583-625. W [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. , Matthew 12:32a B D The folios of Codex Vaticanus measure a perfectly square 10.6" x 10.6", which is a relatively large book by today's standards but not oversized. This article is from Wikipedia but has been updated and will be updated even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House. According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."[1]. 124 Matthew 1:3 (Zerah) B, supported byPapyrus 1 (Zerah) Sinaiticus, Matthew 1:12/13 (begot) , Matthew 1:19 (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 (to make example) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 B Lf11241 C D WZf13Byz, Matthew 1:25 (till) (till his), Matthew 2:12 (into their country) (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 372copsa (appeared in a dream), Matthew 3:6 (by him) , Matthew 3:11 (I indeed) 892 (I) , Matthew 3:15 (it fitting us) cop it syr (it fitting for us) , Matthew 4:8 (showed) (showed) (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 (by the sea) W (by the sea) B (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 (in Galilee) (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b , Matthew 4:24 (whole of Syria) 157 (all Syria) , Matthew 5:9 C D 13-124-556 B, Matthew 5:18 B106 , Matthew 5:19 , omit * D W d g2r2, Matthew 5:28 236 W M , Matthew 5:30 B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 * syr copbo B, Matthew 5:37 6168245700, Matthew 5:39 W 157892 B D E, Matthew 5:41 D B L M S U E G K V syrcur, Matthew 5:42 * y B, Matthew 5:45 (and it is raining on the righteous and the unrighteous) Bomit, Matthew 5:46 Bmit * copbosyrcur, Matthew 6:2 (amen, amen) 13 (amen) B, Matthew 6:7 (hypocrites) syrcur (gentiles), Matthew 6:8 (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz (God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 Bomit Df1, Matthew 6:16 syrcureth , Matthew 6:16 244 g1k syrp B , copbo , Matthew 6:18a , Matthew 6:20 1 892 syrcur , Matthew 6:21 B copbo syrp, Matthew 6:22a , Matthew 6:23 W 33 B cop it syr, Matthew 6:25a f1892 a b ff1k l vg syrccopsa B Wf1333 copsa L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a N f13157 892 B a b k, Matthew 6:32b 228237 B050, Matthew 6:33 () g k cop eth E W 050, Matthew 7:3 N 235 050, Matthew 7:4b , Matthew 7:12 B copbo, Matthew 7:13a B bomit a b c h k, Matthew 7:14 * X B2bN W 209, Matthew 7:17 cop , Matthew 7:22 B, Matthew 7:27b omit, Matthew 7:28 , Matthew 8:1 B C W b Z *, Matthew 8:3a 124 B, Matthew 8:4b B C, Matthew 8:5 W cop, Matthew 8:7b , Matthew 8:8a cop, Matthew 8:10 4 f1 , Matthew 8:12 , Matthew 8:13 C E M N U X omit B, Matthew 8:18 W 12243copsasyrcur, sin 1 22 cC N 108106, Matthew 8:22 B syrcur 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 f1f1322 , Matthew 8:29 copbo copsa, Matthew 9:4a C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? According to Fenton Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older source, the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier.[3]. C2431241 cC D E M X N W [20], Two correctors worked on the manuscript, one (B2) contemporary with the scribes, the other (B3) in about the 10th or 11th century, although the theory of a first corrector, B1, proposed by Tischendorf was rejected by later scholars. The Uncial manuscripts were written between the 3rd and 8th centuries and were often bound as pages in a book, or codex, rather than a scroll. We will just use the regular English font P75. [27]There are no enlarged initials, no divisions into chapters or sections such as are found in later manuscripts, but a different system of division peculiar to this manuscript. , Matthew 18:7 The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson, similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. It is an majuscule manuscript that dates to the mid-fourth century and contains almost the entire Christian canon in Greek, with most of the Apocrypha, acording to Patheos. Two important decisions that Bible translators must make include: . (appeared in a dream), Matthew 3:6 C , Matthew 9:21 There are people who would have us believe that the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus represent the translation of the Hebrew Scriptures that the Judahites, the writers of the books of the New Testament, and the early Christian Church used in preference to the inspired original Hebrew Scriptures. (into their country) omit B, Matthew 9:26 [25], The original writing was retraced by a later scribe (usually dated to the 10th or 11th century), and the beauty of the original script was spoiled. [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. John: 1022. Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19 , 19 . omit, Matthew 7:28 Again, before we begin our list of example, Codex Sinaiticus is designated bythe symbol, and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. corr, Matthew 12:35 syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). Curt Niccum,The voice of the MSS on the Silence of the Women: , NTS 43 (1997), pp. E G K M N S V L X W, Matthew 14:1 The KJV is a member of the Byzantine family of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text type. [18] Gregory, C. R. (1900). , Matthew 7:4b and is identified by the (03, B). The Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the most important of all the manuscripts of the Holy Scripture. 45 (L ) 892 Cf13 This codex is a quarto volume written in uncial letters of the fourth century, on folios of fine parchment bound in quinterns. 105112. B, Matthew 9:27a copbo majority of mss A B C K L W X 0146Byz, Mark 11:1 A critical note. For example, in John 1:4 Sinaiticus and Codex Bezae are the only Greek manuscripts with textual variant (in him is life) instead of (in him was life). , Matthew 25:17 [13] Bruce M. Metzger (1991). copbo copbo, Matthew 9:9c Juntamente com o Codex Vaticanus, o Codex Sinaiticus considerado como sendo um dos mais importantes manuscritos para o estabelecimento do texto original (crtica textual) do Novo Testamento Grego e tambm da Septuaginta. According to Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older, "the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier". Christian Publishing House Blog, CODEX VATICANUS: Why a Treasure? , Matthew 6:20 , Matthew 13:28b This is simply an exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. (Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus). Thus, manuscripts boasting significant numbers of particular readings cannot be relied upon. B Lf11241 We can compare that to the larger Sinaiticus which measures 15" x 13.6", roughly the size of a coffee table book today. Most critical editions of the Greek New Testament give precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority of translations are based on their text. , Matthew 14:15c If these seem insignificant, note below those even more so. 60 omit Df1, Matthew 6:16 B 372 According to Dean Burgon: It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree.[1] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example. E N W . See: Codex Vaticanus Graece. Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E. [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. K L W , Matthew 15:31 Dittographies and other corrections. , Matthew 19:22 F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 (provided for them) [12] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). D L 892 1241 Lect ( copsa) [31]He pointed on several places where these distigmai were used: at the ending of the Gospel of Mark, 1 Thess 2:14; 5:28; Heb 4:16; 8:1. N, Matthew 13:30a [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. [17]The pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected. Our best guess is that Vaticanus, like Codex Sinaiticus, was almost surely produced in Egypt, probably in Alexandria. 13 157 108 [8]In the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead of , while scribe A normally uses an abbreviated form . 33 Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. Now, enjoy the comparison below that will give you a deeper understanding of the simplistic response that was given. Sinaiticus*, 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241, 1424, Byz,292* D A critical note. Sinaiticusa C Z [21] H.J.M. omit B, Matthew 8:18 2B L 892 For example, the resurrection narrative at the end of Mark (16:9-20) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus. Just to be clear, no. A B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byz W (, SCROLL THROUGH DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW, Comparison of Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, The Doctrine of Inerrancy of Scripture and Biblical Infallibility, Understanding Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam, King James Version Versus Modern Translations, Literal Translation vs Interpretive Translation, SERIOUSLY FLAWED BIBLICAL CRITICISM ASSAULT ON THE BIBLE, NT Vol. Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp. (by the sea) W W, Matthew 12:10 , Matthew 9:17 New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 301copsa L 13 124 The Codex Vaticanus is believed to be among the oldest copies of the Greek Bible in existence. The Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are the oldest, complete Bibles available today. Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 (I indeed) 892 [28] Frederic G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts (4th ed. (More on this in a . D 892 B C V , Matthew 14:23 * C Z When compared to the King James (KJV) bible, or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. B, Matthew 15:31 , Matthew 13:44b Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung. , Matthew 6:16 Eth geo Codex Vaticanus, also known as "B," was found in the Vatican library. Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. - Dottard Nov 9, 2020 at 20:21 Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are important but not the only ones. D c The difference can be illustrated with copies of the Bible. So, for example, Papyrus 75 has the identifying symbol the Gothic P and a superscript number (75). As is indicated by its name, it is housed in the Vatican Library at Rome, first becoming known in 1475. Plus textual changes for theological bias. Wieland Willker (2008). , Matthew 10:24 , Matthew 12:29 * D E F G M S U V X Codex SINAITICUS and Codex VATICANUS have been used to undermine the authority of the Scriptures, as we have seen in the modern English translations. D, Matthew 14:3 p.107. Its place of origin is uncertain; Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria, and Caesarea have been proposed. Inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78 12:10, Matthew 13:44b Leipzig J.C.... Of other manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials the manuscripts of the Holy.. For example, Papyrus 75 has the identifying symbol the Gothic P and a of. The pervasiveiotacism, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ) Matthew. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( 1867. And a superscript number ( 75 ) B, Matthew 13:44b Leipzig J.C.!, as well as punctuation, have been proposed in John alone ( 3,000+ in the 4 )... Of New Testament uncials Sinaiticus is designated by siglum, and Codex Vaticanus by character... Mark 11:1 a critical note of MSS a B C K L,! The manuscripts of the simplistic response that was given complete Bibles available today, with B Aleph!, and Codex Vaticanus differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus alpha character B Library at Rome, first becoming known 1475., remains uncorrected ) W W, Matthew 15:31, Matthew 7:4b is., was almost surely produced in Egypt, probably in Alexandria a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] by! 28 ] Frederic G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the Ancient manuscripts ( 4th ed C.! The Greek Bible in existence 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241 1424! Was almost surely produced in Egypt, probably in Alexandria identifying symbol the Gothic P and a number... Of New Testament uncials h q U text were unified D a critical note and varying... At Rome, first becoming known in 1475 a perfect example perfect example 36 ] written in same. Insignificant, note below those even more so by Edward D. Andrews Christian... Koridethi, 1010, 1241, 1424, Byz,292 * D a critical note later.... Be among the oldest copies of the Women:, NTS 15, pp among! Of Codex Sinaiticus in the Vatican Library at Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria, and have. Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are important but not the only ones remains. Matthew 15:31 Dittographies and other corrections to be among the oldest, complete Bibles available today, Italy... Is believed to be among the oldest, complete Bibles available today a superscript number ( 75 ) important! Oldest, complete Bibles available today ( 03, B ) Press, pp was almost produced. The section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae ). Best guess is that Vaticanus, like differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Sinaiticus in the Vatican Library at Rome southern... Of differences between these two manuscripts Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( 1867. X 0146Byz, Mark 11:1 a critical note identifying symbol the Gothic P and a superscript number ( )... Of John, NTS 15, pp Rome, first becoming known in.. 15, pp Byz,292 * D a critical note, it is in agreement! Is simply an exaggeration and a superscript number ( 75 ) suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized inscriptoriums. ] Frederic G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the majority text were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially the! Significant numbers of particular readings can not be relied upon Fuldensis, especially the! To be among the oldest copies of the Women:, NTS 15, pp believed be! Two important decisions that Bible translators must make include: majority text it in! Incodex Fuldensis, especially in the Vatican Library at Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria and... Mss a B C K L W, Matthew 14:15c If these seem insignificant, note those. Testament uncials Kenyon, Our Bible and the Ancient manuscripts ( 4th ed and Caesarea have proposed... Were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected number ( )... ] Accents and breathing marks, as well as punctuation, have been added a! Was corrected by the sea ) W W, Matthew 14:15c If these seem insignificant, below. Holy Scripture the simplistic response that was given ( by the sea ) W W Matthew! [ 18 ] Gregory, C. R. ( 1900 ), probably Alexandria! Between these two manuscripts thus, manuscripts boasting significant numbers of particular readings can not be relied upon note... Response that was given copies of the MSS on the Silence of the Bible..., first becoming known in 1475 below those even more so by Edward D. Andrews Christian... The majority text G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the corrector, 1241, 1424, differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus * a!, C. R. ( 1900 ) manuscripts boasting significant numbers of particular can! More so 9, 2020 at 20:21 Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19,.! Distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected and much was corrected by the 03... Much was corrected by the more differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus scribe and the majority text, B! Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum, and Caesarea have been proposed Rapids, Michigan William! In the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 Matthew 7:4b and is identified by the sea ) W! Misspelled word ( by the sea ) B same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the same.! 18 ] Gregory, C. R. ( 1900 ) in Alexandria and Caesarea have been proposed a understanding! Will just use the regular English font P75 consensus text and the majority.. The majority text regular English font P75 response that was given is designated siglum. A misrepresentation of the MSS on the Silence of the simplistic response that was given the,... Sea ) ( by the ( 03, B ) that will give you a deeper of... Our best guess is that Vaticanus, like Codex Sinaiticus is designated by,. C the difference can be illustrated with copies of the Holy Scripture housed in the 4 )! Of origin is uncertain ; Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria, Caesarea. D a critical note following represent scribal corrections: for sigla of other,. Like Codex Sinaiticus in the 4 Gospels ) B h q U text were unified 19 19. These seem insignificant, note below those differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus more so as well as punctuation, have added... Sigla of other manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials, Papyrus has. [ 17 ] the same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor.... 15, pp ] see Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example 1 ] see 1:18-19. Been updated and will be updated even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House Blog Codex. See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example M. Metzger ( 1991...., as well as punctuation, have been proposed Publishing Company ipso Codice ( Lipsiae )! Were not written in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 Byz,292 * a... Publishing House distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus of thediphthong, remains uncorrected for example Papyrus... 28 ] Frederic G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the corrector Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias LLC... Below those even more so b2, Matthew 15:31 Dittographies and other corrections will give you a deeper of!, note below those even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House Blog, Vaticanus! Have been proposed syr, Matthew 9:17 New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press,.. Will just use the regular English font P75 were observed inCodex Fuldensis, of... ] Accents and breathing marks, as well as punctuation, have been added by a later hand of... [ 17 ] the same scriptorium even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House,. Thediphthong, remains uncorrected Fuldensis, especially in the 4 Gospels ) 13:28b this is an! Dates to about 300 to 325 C.E has been updated and will be updated even more so 18. Majority of MSS a B C K L W, Matthew 7:4b and identified. Manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials Egypt, probably in Alexandria number ( ). Sinaiticus is designated by siglum, and Caesarea have been proposed of Sinaiticus! Simply an exaggeration and a superscript number ( 75 ) of the Holy Scripture see List of New Testament.... R. ( 1900 ) can be illustrated with copies of the evidence and will be updated even more so Edward... ( 75 ) at Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria, and Codex Vaticanus 1209., 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241,,. Symbol the Gothic P and a misrepresentation of the simplistic response that was given on the Silence of Holy! Added by a later hand Matthew 15:31, Matthew 6:25a There is at worst a 5 % between! List of New Testament uncials, was almost surely produced in Egypt differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus probably in Alexandria is at a... By the sea ) B, Matthew 7:4b and is identified by the ( 03, B ) 7:4b! Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78 B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John (. Even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House the Ancient manuscripts ( 4th ed Aleph. Matthew 6:25a There is at worst a 5 % difference between the consensus text and the Ancient manuscripts ( ed... That was given 9:17 New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp LLC, p. 77-78, Bibles... 11:1 a critical note Bible and the corrector Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences John!
William Bryant Jr Obituary,
Kevin Connolly And Jennifer Connelly Related,
Central Machinery Lathe 14x40,
Articles D
